Congratulations to Hequiu Liu for winning the first interview competition.
Congratulations to Sanjina Karki for winning the second competition.
The third competion is open because most students did not rate the third interview.
On Thursday, we'll meet to evaluate the second and third interview winners. This time, I am asking you to tabulate your grades again and link the results to your interview 2 review. Then write 3-4 sentences for each criterion you used to evaluate the interview and post that comment.
1. Create a new post with the title: Interview 3 review
2. Read all papers according to the established guidelines (use the parameters from the salmon sheet I gave you last week, write the results into a google docs page and tabulate as you go)
3. Write a 1-page review of your best paper. If more than one person share the same results, write two or three such reviews. Explain in your review what you liked about that interview. Only interviews with transcriptions can be rated highly. Every student is allowed to not include one transcript, if an interview didn't turn out well.
-----------
Post the topic of your final paper immediately, if not done yet. This is another separate post.
Review how to quote sources and how to write the "Works cited" page on LEO. With the topic of your final paper, also post the outline of the final paper. I want to see whether it's logical.
No comments:
Post a Comment